Cinemadrom Rating and Review! (Last update: Dead)
Business
Let’s check does Cinemadrom Rating and Review is Scam ?
| Etymology | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Cinema + Drom. Noun. drom m (plural drommen) flock (of people). crowd. Means a Cinema for people. | CinemaDrom is a good name. It is easy to write and its pronunciation is similar in all languages. Also, using domain COM is a good advantage over other domains. This name and domain have good originality and are easy to remember. |
Score: 9/10
| Strengths | Weaknesses | . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -Blockchain Advantage -Creat a C2C business -Establish a wide range of communications -Good profitability and RoI -Business plan & Attention to detail -Profitability for filmmakers, actors, and audiences -Creativity and make a value | -Duplicate and old ideas -Complexity and misleading details -Fake MVP -Unusable Roadmap -No long-term prospects -With this experience, this team can not afford to launch such an idea. | |||
| Trustworthy | Profitable | Sustainable | Stereotyped | . |
| No | Yes | No | Yes | |
Score: 8/10
| WhitePaper | ||
|---|---|---|
| Strengths | Weaknesses | Multi-Languages |
| -Good description -Acceptable graphics -Token Allocation -Token Distribution -Disclaimer -Team presentation | -Too many (75) pages -Lots of useless information -Complexity in understanding business -Misleading details -Fake MVP ( explain in the photo below) -Crowded tables and chart -Lack of multilingual support | No |
Score: 6/10
We searched all Russian databases. No company was registered in the name of Cinemadrom.
Also, No business owned by Igor Egorov and Pavel Gubanov.
Score: 1/10
There is no sign of their location. They have no office. The location of team members is also unknown.
Score: 1/10
IT Structure
| Domain | Creation Date | IP | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| CinemaDrom | 07/03/2018 | Coordinated | Protected |
| Whois | UI/UX Score | Web Hosting | Responsive |
| Checked | Good (4/5) | REG.com | Yes |
| DNS Records | SSL/TLS Certificate | Connection Status | Speed Grade |
| No Error | Approved (Let's Encrypt) |  | 30% |
| Multi-Languages | Server Location | Abuse & Scam | |
| Yes (2 Languages) | Saint Petersburg, Russian | Yes (HERE) | |
| Short Description | |||
| The site has good conditions in terms of speed and graphics. But the volume of content and texts is very large and chaotic. External pages are too many and will definitely confuse users for a while. | |||
| In the Media | |||
| ICOBench | ICOHolder | ICOmarks | Coin jinja |
Score: 7/10
| ID | Start Date | Members | Content Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Channel Group | 12/17/2019 08/14/2018 | 450 6.3K | Bad (2/5) |
| Engagement | Fake Members | Scam Report | |
| Medium (3/5) | 10% - 15% | Yes (Below) | |
| Short Description | |||
| The Telegram platform has been active for a long time. There are currently more than 6 groups and channels for different countries and languages. This platform was originally used for Crypto trade and news. Some time ago, they changed the name and logo of the group and started advertising and introducing the Cinemadrom project. | |||
Score: 6/10
| ID | Start Date | Followers | Content Quality | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Page | 16/05/2018 | 1.5K | Good (4/5) | |
| Engagement | Average Likes | Fake Members | Scam Report | |
| Low (2/5) | 7 | 40% - 45% | Low (4/5) | |
| Description | ||||
| Instagram is like Telegram. They started their activities in mid-2018, but since early 2019, they have officially used the name of Cinemadrom and used this page to promot the project. | ||||
Score: 5/10
| ID | Start Date | Followers | Content Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Page | 06/01/2019 | 1.6K | Good (4/5) |
| Engagement | Average Likes | Scam Report | |
| High (4/5) | 24 | No | |
| Short Description | |||
Score: 7/10
They have no Medium page yet.
Score: 1/10
| ID | Start Date | Subscribers | Content Quality | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Channel | 08/07/2018 | 961 | good (4/5) | |
| Engagement | Average Views | Fake Views | Scam Report | |
| Very Low (1/5) | 324 | 5% - 10% | Low (4/5) | |
| Short Description | ||||
| They had a good situation on YouTube a year ago. 4 quality movies with a short time interval. But they have not produced any content for the past 8 months. The situation of promotional films (Airdrop) is relatively good, but the participation of the people is very low. | ||||
Score: 6/10
| ID | Start Date | Followers | Content Quality | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Page | 08/10/2018 | 1.3K | Good (4/5) | |
| Engagement | Average Activity | Fake Members | Scam Report | |
| Medium (3/5) | 14 Feedback | 40% - 45% | Yes (HERE) | |
| Short Description | ||||
| 1300 followers after 2 years of activity, about 40% of which are fake. The content quality is good, but the condition of Twitter is not good at all. The high volume of fake members, like, and retweet is a bit annoying. | ||||
Score: 4/10
| ID | Start Date | Followers | Content Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Page | 08/07/2018 | 2.1K | Good (4/5) |
| Engagement | Average Likes | Fake Members | Scam Report |
| Low (2/5) | 23 | 15% - 20% | Low (4/5) |
| Short Description | |||
Score: 5/10
| ID | Start Date | Members | Content Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| User | 11/27/2019 | 103 | Normal (3/5) |
| Engagement | Karma | Fake Comments | Scam Report |
| Medium (3/5) | 367 | 1% - 5% | Low (4/5) |
| Short Description | |||
| After 9 months of activity, their page had no audience and no charm. It has been more than 2 months since their last post and they do not have significant comments. | |||
Score: 5/10
| ID | Start Date | Read Times | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announcement | 09/11/2019 | 50 | 1 | |
| Bounty | 02/02/2019 | 30954 | 3643 | |
| Content Quality | Engagement | Fake Interaction | Scam Report | |
| Good (4/5) | High (4/5) | 10% - 15% | Very Low (5/5) | |
| Short Description | ||||
| The Bitcointalk situation is great. It is clear that they have spent a lot of time and money for that. Participation in the ANN post was low, but the Bounty campaign was great. But it is very strange for us that everyone is just looking for bounty and no one realizes that this project is completely a scam. | ||||
Score: 9/10
Technical Structure
| Token Name | Symbol | Token Type |
|---|---|---|
| MOVIECASH | MVH | Ethereum |
| LUTOKEN | LUT | Ethereum |
| LUMIERE | The crypto coins LUMIERE cannot be bought on the Cinemadrom project. The LUMIERE can only be obtained by exchanging the LUT token for LUMIERE. | |
| Distributed Token | Remained Token | Price 1 Token |
| 1.36% 0.04% Null | 98.64% 99.96% Null | 1 MVH = $0.10 1 LUT = $1.00 1 LUMIERE = $1.00 |
The token distribution after a year is awful. They have plans for $150 million, but only 1.5% of the tokens have been distributed.
Also, in our experience, scam projects use personal Blockchain. They distribute the initial tokens and then expire them (under the pretext of moving to a new Blockchain). Continue this report to make sure that Cinemadrom Rating and Review is Scam
Score: 4/10
| Token Allocation | Token Distribution | Total Supply | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -Production of Projects: 35% -Marketing, AD, PR: 15% -Traffic & Network: 12% -Opening Offices: 10% -Purchase of Contents: 10% -Bonus of Team: 7% -Coverage of ICO: 5% -Develop Platform: 3% -Legal Services: 2% -Operation Expenses: 1% | -Project Production Fund: 50% -Project Insurence Fund: 17% -Selling Token Investor: 10% -Founders and Team: 10% -Bonus for User: 6% -Marketing Project: 4% -Legal Services: 1% -Charity Projects: 1% -Bounty, Advisors, Partners: 1% | 100,000,000 MVH = $10,000,000 3,000,000,000 LUT = $3,000,000,000 |
|
| Bounty & Airdrop | Live Price | Market Cap | Holders |
| Yes (Unsuccessful) | $0.00 $0.00 | $0.00 $0.00 | 17 27 |
Score: 6/10
ICO (Initial coin offering) details
A few strange points
- It’s been a year and a half since their Pre-ICO, and only 1.5% of their token has been distributed.
- They plan to sell more than $3 Billion in tokens, but their soft cap is $1mil and their hard cap is $150mil. This 150-fold difference has only one meaning. They just want money without a purpose.
- Their ICO time has changed 3 times and their last schedule is for October.
IEO (Initial exchange offering) details
They have announced 3 exchanges for IEO. But they are all fake. We found a lot of fake info and lies in their business. CinemaDrom is not currently listed in any exchange! This really worried us and we made sure that Cinemadrom is Scam.
Score: 3/10
Team
Score: 4/10
The team is highly suspicious. I think the project is only run, 2/3 people. Most of the team are fake or left the project. Every team member has only one photo to be found on the web. They are using Black & white photos in 2020. There is no actual profile for the team members. Most of them are fake. Photoshopped photo most probably can’t found in Google. Their website SSL over. The project has zero links to the film industry as they are claiming.
Score: 5/10
At first glance, Cinemadrom is a good & profitable project. But after a bit of research, you think in fact, you’re facing a failed project that has not been able to grow & is still in the first place after 2 years of launch. But no, do not pity. We ask you to pay a little more attention to detail and found Cinemadrom Rating and Review is Scam. Why? The most important reason for using a fake team and fake MVP. Also a clever scammer who made up the names & posters of 5 movies with a completely fake and unreal team. Maybe these 2 reasons are enough to destroy Cinemadrom. But we have more reasons. No office and no location! Should we ignore it? Ok, but we certainly can’t ignore a $150,000,000 business with serious legal loopholes.
First we currently offer NO short-term or long-term investments on Cinemadrom Scam. Even participating in the bounty campaign is a form of collaborating with them and encourage people to lose their money too.
Summary
CinemaDrom
Positive
- Good Idea.
- Attention to details.
- Good & Complete Site.
- Great Activity on BitcoinTalk.
- Acceptable RoI (After The Launch).
- Token Allocation & Distribution.
Negative
- Fake MVP (Scam).
- Fake & Liar Team.
- Fake Advisors (Stolen Name).
- Serious Legal Loopholes.
- No Location & Office.
- Poor digital marketing.
- Unbelievable Hard cap ($150 mil).
- Only 1.4% Disteributed Token.
- Very Low Holders & Token Transactions.
- Expired Business (2 Years non activity).
1 comment
Comments are closed.